Present Feedback
- Professor Dr. Mohammad Tariqur Rahman on Happy birthday celebration, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine
- Regret on Pleased birthday, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine
- Lee Rudolph on Drug researchers trip up, lifting paper that is meth compose one on LSD
We’re on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Delighted birthday, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine
Nine years back this coming Saturday, on August 3, 2010, we published a post, “Why write a web log about retractions?”
Exactly exactly What happens to be clear into the intervening nine years is exactly what a rich vein retractions are as tales of what goes on whenever one thing goes incorrect in technology. So that as we now have done each year at the moment, we’ll review what occurred within the last one year.
Share this:
Drug researchers trip up, raising paper that is meth compose one on LSD
Evidently meth is really a gateway medication … for publishing misconduct.
Scientists in Asia have actually lost a 2019 paper on what LSD can harm vision because they’d lifted a lot of the paper from a write-up which had showed up the entire year before in a journal that is different about methamphetamine.
The article that is retracted “Long-term systemic therapy with lysergic acid diethylamide causes retinal harm in CD1 mice,” starred in Human & Experimental Toxicology. In accordance with the article:
Share this:
Writers object as “doubtful” information doom dermatology paper
A dermatology journal has retracted a 2017 article by a set of scientists in Saudi Arabia after getting a complaint that is“serious about the integrity for the information. However the very first writer of the paper pushed straight back, saying the move had been unjustified.
This article, “Successful usage of blended corticosteroids and rituximab in an individual with refractory polyarteritis that is cutaneous,” ended up being published by Ibrahim Al-Homood and Mohammad Aljahlan, rheumatologists at King Fahad healthcare City in Riyadh and appeared in the Journal of Dermatology & Dermatologic Surgical treatment. It described (with instead grisly photos) the truth of a 25-year-old guy with serious leg ulcers that fixed after the described combination therapy.
But during the notice describes, the paper can’t be trusted:
Share this:
Kyoto University suspends author that is first of Kumamoto quake paper
The initial writer of a now-retracted paper in technology in regards to the ramifications of the lethal 2016 Kumamoto earthquake in Japan happens to be suspended from their college place for starters year.
Intending Lin, for the Department of Geophysics at Kyoto University, had been sanctioned by the organization for misconduct stemming from their abuse of information and plagiarism into the 2016 paper:
Share this:
Sunday checks out: A sleuth whoever work has resulted in a huge selection of retractions and corrections; an “unethical, dangerous and deceptive” attention research; genetics’ high retraction price
You enjoy our weekly roundup before we present this week’s Weekend Reads, a question: Do? If therefore, we’re able to really use your assistance. Can you start thinking about a tax-deductible contribution to help sunday Reads, and our day to day work? Many Many Thanks ahead of time.
Share this:
Forensics Friday: could you flag this paper if it had been under review?
Ever wished to hone your abilities being a clinical sleuth? Now’s your opportunity.
Due to the United states Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (ASBMB), that will be focused on educating authors on guidelines in publishing, figure planning, and reproducibility, we’re presenting the tenth in a set, Forensics Friday.
Have a look at the image below, and then just simply take our poll. From then on, click the website link below to discover the right response.
Share this:
Cock and bull story contributes to retraction of bovine herpesvirus paper
The ancients had a plain thing for hybrids (think pets, maybe not automobiles): half goat-half people, horses with individual torsos, winged horses and lions, you will get the image. But a chicken-cow mix wasn’t on that list … until now.
A team of scientists in Brazil has lost a paper in a journal that is veterinary attempting to reuse information from a chicken research within their paper on herpesvirus infections in cattle.
This article, “Bovine Herpesvirus 5 promotes dysfunction that is mitochondrial cultured bovine monocyte-derived macrophages and never influence virus replication,” starred in February into the journal Veterinary Microbiology.
Share this:
‘Not biologically plausible’: questions about survey information make fluorosis paper a banner
A article that is recent provided a stark caution in regards to the dangers to kids of fluoride into the nation’s water happens to be tagged with a manifestation of concern following the book of a fresh paper which undermines the dependability regarding the initial information.
The content, “Dental fluorosis trends in US dental health studies: 1986 to 2012,” starred in March in JDR Clinical & Translational analysis, a dental log. The very first writer on the paper is Christopher Neurath, associated with the American Environmental wellness Studies Project, which advocates against fluoridation of water.
This article, that used information through the nationwide health insurance and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) when it comes to years 2011 and 2012, reported increases that are“large extent and prevalence” of fluorosis over that period — continuing a trend dating back to towards the mid-1980s.
In accordance with the researchers:
Share this:
Gravitational areas, silkworm excrement, and “putor” programs: exactly How did this “pure, utter nonsense” get into in a peer-reviewed log?
Often, a paper arrives that is therefore revolutionary, it defies description. Therefore versus make an effort to do justice to a paper that is recent Parasitology Research, we’ll replicate a couple of paragraphs here:
Share this:
Leech paper nets phrase of concern
A write-up claiming to uproot the evolutionary tree of leeches has gotten a manifestation of concern after a audience notified the log about possible issues with the information.
The content, “Phylogenomic analysis of a putative link that is missing reinterpretation of leech development,” appeared online in Genome Biology and Evolution, an Oxford University Press name, on June 19 of the year. In accordance with the authors — a worldwide group that includes scientists during the nationwide Museum of Natural History, the new york Museum of Natural Sciences, Florida State University and University of Gothenburg in Sweden — their results:
